We may earn money when you buy through our links. Join 5M+ viewers on our YouTube channel >>
9 min read
Data Analysis ByDaniel DelgadoFor over 11 years, SafeWise experts have conducted independent research and testing to write unbiased, human reviews (not robots). Learn more.
We use FBI crime statistics data to rank cities in each state and across the country. To add extra insight and depth to that assessment, we include demographic information and the results of our proprietary State of Safety research study.
The "safest" cities rankings are intended to highlight cities with low crime rates and ignite conversation and action around how to make all cities and communities safer.
For the purposes of city ranking reports, the terms “dangerous” and “safest” refer explicitly to crime rates as calculated from FBI crime data—no other characterization of any community is implied or intended.
We use the most up-to-date FBI crime data as the backbone of our reports. This means we rely on voluntary, self-reported information that cities and jurisdictions across the country report through the FBI Summary Reporting System (SRS) and National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). If you don’t see your city listed, it could be due to the population threshold, incomplete data, or the failure to submit a report. For our 2025 reporting year, the most recent FBI data was released in October 2024 and accounts for crimes reported in the calendar year 2023.
We know that crime statistics are only one measure of what makes any community safe.
We also use population thresholds for each state. Using population data (as reported to the FBI), we identify the median city population for all cities that reported to the FBI in each state. We report only on cities with populations above this median for each state. This reduces the risk of outliers and lowers the likelihood of an extreme outlier skewing the data.
Because every city in a state may not report to the FBI, a state's total population may not be accounted for, and the median population we determine is likely different than a median based on US Census data.
The FBI data is just one way that cities report crime statistics, and we know that it may differ from other reports a city or police department submits. But, to make sure that we’re comparing apples to apples, we’ve chosen to use this data as the basis of our "safest" cities reporting. Plus, this is the most consistent report available for most cities across the nation.
A note about population data:
It has come to our attention that, on occasion, data may be skewed by outlying factors such as large commuter populations, college campuses, and incarcerated populations. In those cases, crime rates calculated based solely on crime reports and population numbers may not give an accurate representation of a particular community. We appreciate these nuances and are considering their potential impact to future reports.
To identify the safest cities of 2025, we reviewed 2023 FBI crime report statistics (the most recent complete report available at the time of ranking) and population data.
Cities that fell below identified population thresholds—or that failed to submit a complete crime report to the FBI—were excluded from the report.
Our rankings are based on both violent and property crime numbers. We looked at the number of reported violent crimes (aggravated assault, murder, rape, and robbery) in each city and the number of reported property crimes (burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft).
Arson is excluded from the FBI’s property crime rates, so we excluded it as well.
To level the playing field, we calculated the rate of crimes per 1,000 people in each city. This makes it easier to directly compare the likelihood of these crimes occurring in cities with vastly different populations. (By comparison, the FBI uses the number of crimes per 100,000 people to calculate its rates.)
Both violent and property crime numbers were weighted equally. That means that a city with no violent crimes reported could end up lower on the list due to a higher property crime rate, and vice versa. We also standardized violent and property crime for each state before weighting.
To identify the safest and most dangerous metro areas in the country, we analyzed FBI crime report statistics and population data. We set a population threshold at 300,000 and higher. Metro areas that fell below that threshold were excluded, along with metros that failed to submit a complete crime report to the FBI.
Metro areas were ranked based on the number of reported violent crimes (aggravated assault, murder, rape, and robbery) and the number of reported property crimes (burglary, larceny-theft, and motor vehicle theft). To level the playing field, we calculated the rate of crimes per 1,000 people in each city. Weighting and normalization for the metro cities was applied the same way as for the "safest" cities in each state, described in more detail below.
In addition to city rankings for 2025, we also conducted our sixth annual nationwide survey to find out Americans’ top safety concerns. Over the past six years, we’ve polled more than 30,000 Americans about their attitudes and perceptions around safety and crime—and what they're doing to feel safer.
We add these correlations and other useful findings to our safest cities reports.
The State of Safety study referenced in the 2025 Safest Cities reports used a 10-minute online survey that was fielded in August 2024 by Lux Insights. Lux spoke to 5,000 respondents across the US (at least 100 from every state). Quotas were set to ensure age, household income, gender, and ethnicity breakouts aligned with census data. Based on the number of completions, the margin of error is ±1.4%. Each state has a margin of error of approximately ±9.8%. All results are shown at the 95% confidence level.
The State of Safety survey asked participants to rate how concerned they were about each crime and safety issue using a scale from one to seven. One was “not at all concerned,” and seven was “highly concerned." For comparison and ranking purposes, responses were grouped into three ranges:
The fieldwork period landed in the latter part of the year. Because of this, respondents were asked to reflect on their perceptions through August 2024 and, in some cases, to reflect on their sense of safety or concerns in 2024 compared to how they felt in 2023. Results of the survey are used to augment the FBI data to give a more complete picture of how attitudes and sentiment about crime and safety compare to trends in reported crimes.
We first looked at the number of respondents who indicated high concern about their general safety and security on a daily basis. This gave us a baseline for the overall level of concern across the US and state by state.
From there, we compared responses from each state to see which safety concerns and crime issues had the highest and lowest levels of concern. We asked which safety concerns respondents worry about on a daily basis, as well as their concern about falling victim to different types of crime.
We also asked respondents what (if any) safety and security precautions they use to protect themselves and their property. This year, we added questions about cybercrime.
For the fifth time in the history of our survey, we asked survey participants about their perceptions of and concerns about gun violence. This started in the 2019 State of Safety survey, where we singled out mass shootings.
These last four years, we explored gun violence as a whole—based on many spontaneous answers in unaided questions from the first year that indicated high concern in this broader area.
For the fourth time in the history of our survey, we asked survey participants about their perceptions of and concerns about package theft. This is the third year we asked participants about what measures they take to protect packages from thieves.
Data from the State of Safety survey and our Package Theft Survey contribute to our annual Worst Metro Cities for Package Theft report.
Because safety goes beyond crime and public health, we expanded our survey for the third consecutive year to cover natural disasters. Specifically, we asked respondents how they prepare for natural disasters and whether they evacuated due to a natural disaster or extreme weather event in the 12 months prior to the survey. We also asked which types of natural disasters caused the most concern.
In response to a large number of survey respondents naming cybercrime and digital security as top concerns in open-ended questions on our previous survey, we added questions specific to cybercrime to the survey that was fielded in August 2024. We asked respondents to reflect on how concerned they are about cyber crime, whether or not they've experienced cybercrime, and what protection methods they currently use.
The sixth annual (2024) package theft survey used a 16-question online survey fielded in August 2024 using Pollfish. We collected responses from 2,500 respondents (50 from each state) across the US. The survey asked participants about their first-hand experiences with package theft.
Respondents were then asked explicitly about their experiences with package theft in the 12 months prior to the survey, including if they experienced it multiple times, the average value of stolen packages, and any methods employed to prevent package theft before and after experiencing a theft.
Age groups
Gender
Pollfish employs a survey methodology called Random Device Engagement (RDE) to reach a vast audience without using monetary incentives. RDE is an evolution of Random Digit Dialing (RDD) and operates within popular mobile apps. This approach leverages a neutral environment similar to RDD and targets users who aren't intentionally participating in surveys.
We constantly seek to improve our reports and provide valuable insights into safety and crime across the US. In light of current events and unrest across the country throughout the past four years, we're taking an even closer look at how we report on the communities we rank.
We recognize that using FBI crime data, as self-reported by local law enforcement agencies, is a one-dimensional and inadequate measure of our nation’s communities.
Crime data, on its own, misses many nuances that contribute to safety—or the lack thereof—including the persistent systemic issues of police violence, economic disparity, and racism.
Simple counts of violent and property crime incidents don't reflect important realities that impact both the perception and the reality of safety in neighborhoods and cities.
Throughout 2024, we are seeking additional ways to quantify and evaluate both perceived and actual safety across the country. Whenever possible, we aim to augment our reporting with unique data sets, robust criteria, and deeper investigation into selected communities and cities.
Starting in 2020, we added supplemental data points to our safest and most dangerous metro area reports, including the following factors:
We chose these data points because, over the past nine years, we’ve observed a correlation between socioeconomic factors and reported crime rates.
In 2018, we launched our sentiment survey, the State of Safety, to help us better understand and contextualize crime and how people across the country feel about safety—at home and in their community. We added this dimension to our safest city reports starting in 2020 as a first step toward improving the relevance and veracity of these rankings.
Each year that we’ve conducted the survey, we’ve made modifications and additions in order to respond to changing times, attitudes, and trends. Starting with our 2020 State of Safety survey, we narrowed our focus to the most impactful crime issues and added questions about the pandemic and other trending concerns (including package theft and police violence).
In 2022, we expanded our focus to include natural disasters and more depth on package theft. In our most recent survey, we added questions about cybercrime.
Starting with our 2021 State of Safety survey, we prioritized collecting a representative demographic sample of Americans, seeking both economic and racial/ethnic diversity among survey respondents. This demographic information continues to be a part of our annual surveys.
We believe it’s important to have a representative sample when it comes to addressing perceptions of and concerns about safety and crime across the U.S. and in each state. Ultimately, we choose not to use this demographic information to compare and contrast data in our full report because we want to avoid harmful generalizations of any demographic group or community.
We will continue to seek a deeper understanding of the assets and challenges within the cities we rank in an effort to move the conversation beyond crime. We endeavor to engage in discourse that addresses the underlying issues that can either help or hurt the safety and well-being of a community. We also seek to offer solutions to help make individuals, families, and larger communities safer.
SafeWise uses data from the Gun Violence Archive (GVA) to track gun violence incidents. We also adhere to the GVA definitions for mass shootings, officer-involved incidents, and self-defense incidents.
Mass shooting definition: “If four or more people are shot or killed in a single incident, not involving the shooter, that incident is categorized as a mass shooting based purely on that numerical threshold.”
All GVA data is current as of the date last accessed. The GVA regularly changes and updates its data as incidents are examined for accuracy.
In 2013, the FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) program revised the definition for collecting rape offense data. The legacy definition only included incidents of “forcible” rape. The new definition doesn’t include the term “forcible.” Instead, any carnal knowledge (or penetration) without the consent of the victim now meets the UCR (and NIBRS) rape offense definition.
The NIBRS and most states use the new definition to report rape offenses. This creates a distinct variance between the number of rapes reported using the new definition and legacy data. Using the current definition, rape offenses are typically the third-most reported violent crime offense (11% of all violent crimes in the latest data).
Although package theft, if represented at all, is included in the FBI UCR data among larceny-theft incidents, SafeWise recognizes it as a subcategory that is growing across the country. We have adopted the definition of package theft as identified in a recent American Journal of Criminal Justice study.
Package theft definition: “Taking possession of a package or its contents, outside of a residence or business, where it has been commercially delivered or has been left for commercial pick-up, with intent to deprive the rightful owner of the contents.”
FBI Crime Data Explorer, "Documents & Downloads." Accessed March 17, 2025.
Bureau of Justice Statistics, "National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS)." Accessed March 17, 2025.
SafeWise, "2024 State of Safety Survey." Accessed March 17, 2025.
Gun Violence Archive, "General Methodology." Accessed March 17, 2025.
Gun Violence Archive, "Mass Shootings." Accessed March 17, 2025.
Subscribe to SafeWise for updates on safety news, product releases, and deals!
